Over on AV1611 there is a discussion about a person named Rick Beckman who has written that there were changes of meaning in some of the wording between the 1611 KJV and the 1769 edition, contrary to claims made by KJVO people that changes were only minor typographical errors, etc.
In response to Beckman's article, a person called tonybones2112 responded with the following:
"He himself is a liar Cody, he can't point to one "version" of the Bible he himself believes is perfect and inspired. I don't trust these people and their "differences" without actually seeing the texts myself, and it's a useless wild goose chase anyway over meaningless redundancies. What the people had in 1611 was perfect for them, what they had in 1660 was perfect for them, what the people had in 1769 was perfect for them, what we have today is perfect for us. What I want to know is how much preaching of the cross this man has done himself this week? Has he shown anyone this week how to be reconciled to God?"
There you have it. Each generation has had an Edition of the KJV that was "perfect for them".
