She is an anti - Anything Goes - Live Forums - Bible Versions Discussion Board - Message Board - Yuku

RSS
Email

0 Kudo

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

She is an anti

Author	Comment
gconan	She is an anti	Lead	[-]
Posts: 954 (05/26/2009 16:54:18) Registered User Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Tags : None Sotomayor is a graduate from Princeton University, where her legal theses included Race in the American Classroom, and Undying Injustice: American "Exceptionalism" and Permanent Bigotry, and Deadly Obsession: American Gun Culture. In this text, the student Sotomayor explained that the Second Amendment to the Constitution did not actually afford individual citizens the right to bear arms, but only duly conferred organizations, like the military. Instead of making guns illegal, she argues that they have been illegal for individuals to own since the passing of the Bill of Rights. Obama's Supreme Pick
mko		#1	[-]
Posts: 547 (05/26/2009 17:02:42) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	To get her interpretation you have to flunk at English... "Things don't happen together by coincidence, without the hand of God guiding them. Like, say, your ex-girlfriend hunting you down for a date the minute you give up on love, with an eye on the altar."
SAWBONES		#2	[-]
Posts: 182 (05/26/2009 19:29:38) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	I despise people who are incapable of clear thinking. It's never been clear to me how anyone could conceivably interpret the 2A as anything but an individual personal right.
Decalogue		#3	[-]
Posts: 12 (05/27/2009 02:37:25) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Amen folks! The 1st amendment is only as good as the 2nd Amendment. From the info posted by gconan --- it looks/reads like this person is another in a long line of political leftos who have decided to make the courts/judicial branch the way to pass laws INSTEAD of going through the State Legislatures and the Congress . Ya know... it is interesting how much the Bolsheviks/Communists of the USSR and the National Socialist Party of Germany [ Nazi ] ( 1933-1945) had in common. Both of those governments told people what to think. Both told them that "The State" was more important than God-Church-Family. Both of them practiced very tight gun confiscation / very tight gun ownership rules. Both of those governments had firearms in the hands of the "Secret Police" , regular police , and the branches of the military and the "Intel/Security forces. I would suggest that anyone reading this Thread look up the word "Totalitarianism" on the Wikipedia site. I read it the other day while reading some info about a man who volunteered to fight in the Spanish Civil War (1936-'39 ) and "Viola !" The light bulb went ON! Please visit www.prayerbookbaptist.com "The grass withereth, the flower fadeth, but the word of our God shall stand for ever!" Isaiah 40:8
mko		#4	[-]
Posts: 549 (05/27/2009 03:51:31) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	It's like you have leftwing nutjobs and rightwing nutjobs. What about the center-wing nutjobs like me? runs "Things don't happen together by coincidence, without the hand of God guiding them. Like, say, your ex-girlfriend hunting you down for a date the minute you give up on love, with an eye on the altar."
Armchair Scholar		#5	[-]
Posts: 961 (05/27/2009 08:33:21) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	>>Amen folks! The 1st amendment is only as good as the 2nd Amendment. And this they know all too well. They have to reinterpret the Second so they can do the same with the First. These two amendments stand in their way. If they can change the meaning, and convince Americans that they are right, they can change everything else this country was founded upon. From what I heard, she also believes in legislation from the bench, something that Obama, in his introduction yesterday, denied.
SAWBONES		#6	[-]
Posts: 190 (05/28/2009 11:29:00) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	In a related vein, but over a First Amendment issue, San Diego county is now actually attempting to interfere with Bible study in a private home: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,522637,00.html
77		#7	[-]
Posts: 502 (05/28/2009 12:24:55) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	SAWBONES wrote: In a related vein, but over a First Amendment issue, San Diego county is now actually attempting to interfere with Bible study in a private home: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,522637,00.html 77: After Googling this story, it seems possible that what is going on here is that the county is hoping to make money off of this couple by way of fines due to excess traffic in the neighborhood. It's hard to say for sure, and no less despicable - and unconstitutional - but it does ring true. I was once sued by a neighborhood association for having a guest park on the lawn on the side of my garage (for about three days). It's no stretch, particularly in Minnesota these days, to imagine a county government stooping to new low levels to drum up extra cash. I hope they sue the county. "Truly, good Christian reader, we never thought from the beginning, that we should need to make a new Translation, nor yet to make of a bad one of a good one ... but to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one principle good one, not justly to be expected against; that hath been our endeavor, that our mark."
AlFin		#8	[-]
Posts: 100 (05/29/2009 15:03:17) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	gconan wrote: In this text, the student Sotomayor explained that the Second Amendment to the Constitution did not actually afford individual citizens the right to bear arms, but only duly conferred organizations, like the military. Instead of making guns illegal, she argues that they have been illegal for individuals to own since the passing of the Bill of Rights. The recent decision by the Supreme Court concerning gun rights differs from her opinion. http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf Allen Last Edited By: AlFin 05/29/2009 15:05:34. Edited 1 times.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Quick Reply

Rules Page