Since we can't debunk every lie that 'scientists' have devised in their big bang, speciation, and abiogenesis religions, let's go one step
at a time. First, let's talk about the Big Bang in relation to the size of the universe. The Big Bang cosmology is based on what is called the Copernican
Principle. It is the idea that the universe is the same everywhere which is a basic starting assumption. While popular literature implies a universe that has a
boundary and center according to the Copernican Principle there is no boundary or center. The Copernican Principle is an arbitrary, evolutionary assumption
that relies upon man's word. On the other hand, the Bible, implies that the universe has a boundary and that the Earth is near the center, thus providing
substitute starting assumptions contradictory to that of the Copernican Principle.
The big bang is not feasible without assuming the existence of two things: dark energy and dark matter. According to Astrophysicists, 23% of the universe is
made up of known matter, and the other 77% is dark energy and dark matter, which gives the universe the 'weight' it needs for their model to be
accurate. If the universe is truly expanding at the speed of light, then not enough time has passed for the background radiation of the universe to be the
same temperature on opposite sides? The universe is not a homogenous soup, so different amounts of energy have been dispersed throughout the universe. Why is
the background radiation homogenous when the universe is not? Nothing travels faster than light, so if you're heading at the speed of light in opposite
directions there should be no uniformity in temperature. Not to mention their model is an estimate of a 10 billion to 20 billion year old universe,
doesn't sound very scientific to me, how about you?
Creation science on the matter is far more comprehensible. It is explained without the assumption that 77% of the universe is made up of stuff we've never
observed. It used Einstein's theories of relativity (special and general) to show that if Earth is in the center of the universe, then time will pass
slower here than in the outskirts of the universe. The theory is that there are five dimensions (time, spatial expansion velocity and the normal three
dimensions of space. Cosmological Relativity successfully accounts for two phenomena that cosmologists have often invoked so called dark matter to explain:
the rotational curves of spiral galaxies and gravitational lensing (basically, why do some celestial bodies spin opposite directions if they were all thrown
from the same big bang). If you're thrown off a merry go round for example, you still spin with the rotation of the merry go round, not in the opposite
rotation. The result is that Cosmological Relativity essentially eliminates any need for so called dark matter. Cosmological Relativity totally eliminates
the need for dark energy since the accelerating expansion is an intrinsic part of its 5D space - time - velocity manifold.
Dr. John G Hartnett has applied Cosmological relativity to a bounded universe. Under general relativity the gravity potential of a bounded universe would
induce a large scale curvature to space for which there is no evidence. He found that, due to the accelerating expansion, Cosmological relativity would
eliminate this curvature, making space as flat as it would be in an unbounded universe. This would be true as long as the radius ( r ) was at least cτ.
Infinity > r ≥ cτ He showed that observations are consistent with a bounded universe inside a white hole with our galaxy at or near the center. Dr. John G
Hartnett has shown that Cosmological relativity is observationally consistent with a finite bounded universe. He has since shown that the 5D Cosmological
relativistic line element shows that the universe is young by Earth clocks and that light from the most distant stars could have arrived at the Earth within
the Creation week.
These works are paraphrasing of Dr. Hartnett's research, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0508367 , http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/4974 and http://www.creationwiki.org/Cosmological_relativity .
