For those who have not yet seen the documents for themselves, they can be found at www.avpublications.org .
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Armchair Scholar |
Gail Riplinger Maiden Name Update |
Lead | |
|
I just wanted to confirm publicly, for the record, that I have obtained a certified copy of Riplinger's daughter's birth certificate, which shows Gail
Riplinger listed as "Gail Anne Ludwig" under "MOTHER'S MAIDEN NAME", with her husband listed as "Michael D. Riplinger." This,
indeed, verifies that her maiden name was Ludwig, the same as the Gail Anne Ludwig who married Michael Dominick Riplinger in 1984, as listed on the marriage
certificate that clearly shows her previous divorce to husband number two. According to D.A. Waite, Riplinger has denied that she has ever been divorced. This
is, yet, another lie form Gail Riplinger and one that coincides with the multitude of lies that she has published in her books. Riplinger has shown that she is
a bit too comfortable with lying. Where is her fear of God? For the sake of those Christians who do not desire to follow after false teachers, and who want to
know whether someone they trust is a false teacher (liars who teach false doctrine count as false teachers), this information is being made public. The Apostle
Paul publicly exposed false teachers and God has given Scriptural mandates to expose the works of darkness.
For those who have not yet seen the documents for themselves, they can be found at www.avpublications.org .
Last Edited By: Armchair Scholar 02/13/2008 15:05:29.
Edited 1 time.
|
|||
brandpluckt |
|||
|
Where is the link found on your page for the daughter's birth certificate?
BTW Riplinger would probably give an answer about her divorces in a similar fashion as Ruckman appears to do. He claims he has never "put away" his previous two wives. The answer is obvious they "put him away." Ruckman also claims that the woman cannot "put away" the husband since no verse allows for it. (How's that for sexist "eisegesis?") Ruckman's sorry hermeneutical excercise does not allow Riplinger to get off of the hook. KJV Matthew 5:32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
Ken Willy
|
|||
mko |
|||
brandpluckt wrote: And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife and marry another committeth adultery against her. And if a woman shall put away her husband and be married to another, she committeth adultery. (Mk 10.11-12 KJV (NR)) Way to selectively read, Ruckman...
"God looks out for me, because nobody else gives."
|
|||
brandpluckt |
|||
|
mko: Way to selectively read, Ruckman...
The verse that you cited is to be found nowhere in Ruckman's booklet on the subject of divorce and remarriage, nor is it found in his Matthew commentary under the salient passages of Matt. 5:32 and chapter 19.
Ken Willy
|
|||
mko |
|||
|
Go figure. But it is in the KJV - as much as Ruckman seems to fail to grasp that.
"God looks out for me, because nobody else gives."
|
|||
Armchair Scholar |
|||
brandpluckt wrote:
These false teachers are something, proving that Satan has not lost his clever, crafty touch since the Garden of Eden. It is truly unfortunate how they misuse the word of God that way, hiding behind it to justify their own perverse thinking, while at the same time pretending to defend the Word. GAR sought and filed for divorce in both instances; she was the plaintiff in both divorces. For the second divorce, she married her current husband only two months afterward. She filed for the current marriage less than a month after the divorce. The dates don't lie, but we know that GAR does, and so does Ruckman. These people are like naughty little children who play word games that they think somehow fakes innocence. No, Ruckman's absurd and destructive divorce guidelines don't work for GAR. The Bible also says that if a woman divorces her husband she is to remain unmarried as long as he is alive, otherwise she commits adultery. Few women marry another man only two months after a divorce without knowing that man for some period of time beforehand (and most likely for more than just two months). GAR appears to have found herself another honey and wanted to get out of the marriage she was in so she could go be with her new man. I'm not going to beat around the bush anymore. I'm calling it what it obviously looks like. She committed adultery against her first husband when she married her second, and committed adultery against her second (and probably the first also, again, according to Scripture) when she dumped him to marry Mike. She needs to own up to her actions and repent for having covered them up and lying about them. To me, her sly and sordid past (which she has been most diligent to keep concealed) goes hand in hand with the lying fraud and false teacher that she is, making easy money off those who don't know the truth of the matter concerning God's word, it's preservation, it's history, etc. GAR's past is coming back to haunt her and I hope that people will choose not to be suckered by her any more. God said, "be sure, your sin will find you out." Her deceitful actions, over and over, prove to me that she does not really believe God's word and has no use for it. She found herself a vehicle for making money off a certain segment of the world's population. She prays on people the same way any other false teacher does. She helped ruin my former church fellowship. I have helped expose other false teachers in the past and I will continue to help expose her, and Ruckman, and any of the others. I am onto Riplinger; her plays at innocence, at playing the victim, don't fool me. Sorry, I haven't put the birth certificate up there yet. I want to do it in such a way that it protects her daughter, who didn't ask to be born into this ridiculous, cultish fiasco. I need to make a copy of it so I can blot out all the daughter's personal info before I can make it public. I just wanted to let everyone know that I had obtained a copy and that GAR is indeed listed as Gail Anne Ludwig under Mother's maiden name. She and Ruckman can keep playing their word games. My biggest hope is that those who are truly convicted by the Holy Spirit will recognize that these people are liars whose mouths lead to the pit of hell. The destruction in churches that they have wrought will probably not be fully known until the judgment. As convinced by their lies as Ruckman and GAR might be, it makes me wonder if one day they will try to sell their little stories to God when they stand before him. Their actions prove to me that they have absolutely NO fear of God and most likely don't believe He really exists. The God of my Bible (KJV, NKJV, NASB, ESV) is mighty and awesome and fearful. What part of "consuming fire" do these people not understand? They are frauds and I pray that more people will have their eyes opened and see that.
Last Edited By: Armchair Scholar
02/19/2008 09:00:07.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
Sandra386 |
|||
My biggest hope is that those who are truly convicted by the Holy Spirit will recognize that these people are liars whose mouths lead to the pit of hell. The destruction in churches that they have wrought will probably not be fully known until the judgment. As convinced by their lies as Ruckman and GAR might be, it makes me wonder if one day they will try to sell their little stories to God when they stand before him. Their actions prove to me that they have absolutely NO fear of God and most likely don't believe He really exists. The God of my Bible (KJV, NKJV, NASB, ESV) is mighty and awesome and fearful. What part of "consuming fire" do these people not understand? They are frauds and I pray that more people will have their eyes opened and see that.Hi Armchair, My company went home this morning, but I have been fighting a cold in the mean time. I've been catching up on my reading. I couldn't help but think as I was reading over what you were saying the matter concerning the doctrine of unconditional security. It is apparent that Riplinger has a testimony, and Ruckman has one. At one time they accepted the Lord Jesus. You said in another post: Because we are all truly unrighteous (before and after we are saved) is why the born-again person needs the righteousness of Christ. It is now His righteousness that presents me before the Holy God of the universe. In Romans 3:9-24 we are told that "ALL have turned aside to their own way and that there is none who do good, not even one; all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God." This is why we need the grace of God in what Christ did "once for all" on the cross.If this is true what you said above, then what difference does it make how they live? I'm not asking this to be cocky, but just want to point out the contradiction of this doctrine so prevalent in the churches today. If they truly made a true profession of faith at some point in their life, and have gone off in the prodigal son road, according to the doctrine of unconditional eternal security, they are still a son, they have not lost that relationship. You say that all of us are truly unrighteous before and after we are saved. I don't see where it says that in Scripture. You quoted some Scripture, but I wanted to take it in context. It is usually one to try and prove that babies are born sinners. "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one. Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes. " This is not talking about babies. This is not about going from lost to more lost. "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one" is taken from Psalms 14:3. God had defined the way and prescribed path (Ex. 32:8..), but they turned aside from it, not that they were born that way. The "tongues they have used deceit," and "feet are swift to shed blood" is not describing the actions of infants. "There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God." The lack of understanding is a moral failure, a lack of heart understanding. It's not that he couldn't understand. Understanding is always available to those who want to know truth (Ps. 119:104, 130; Isa. 8:10; John 7:17, etc.). To make Romans 3:10 ("there is none that seeketh after God") a blanket statement of all mankind is to make the Scriptures to be in contradiction. The Lord himself says, "And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart" (Jer. 29:13) If a person's heart does not seek after God, then you have a person who doesn't care to find, who ends up with a heart that doesn't understand. The condition of being without understanding is certainly avoidable and so puts the person in a blameworthy condition. You also said that we cannot know those who are truly saved. What about the Scriptures that tell us we know those who are born of God?
I have on my site "The Myth of Imputation" as taught today. I believe one has the imputation of Christ as long as he believes and is obeying God. As you say, "sin is sin," and God has not changed His mind about sin. Anyway, those are just my thoughts. |
|||
Sandra386 |
|||
|
You also said that we cannot know those who are truly saved. What about the Scriptures that tell us we know those who are born of God?
1 John 3:1-10. How can one be "unrighteous" after being saved in light of 1 John 3:10? Correction. 1 John 3:7 The whole chapter is good. |
|||
Armchair Scholar |
|||
|
Hi Sandra, I don' t have time right now to respond, but maybe in the next few days. I hope you are over the cold and feeling better.
|
|||
Sandra386 |
|||
|
Hi Armchair,
Thank you for your response. I still have the cold but I'm feeling better than I had been. |
|||
|
|