Yuku free message boards

Quote:

---

I see. Can you document it then?

---

Sure. The Westminster Confession of Faith (and the London Confession used by Baptists is very similar) says:

VIII. The Old Testament in Hebrew (which was the native language of the people of God of old), and the New Testament in Greek (which, at the time of the writing of it, was most generally known to the nations), being immediately inspired by God, and, by his singular care and providence, kept pure in all ages, are therefore authentical;[17] so as, in all controversies of religion, the church is finally to appeal unto them.[18] But, because these original tongues are not known to all the people of God, who have right unto, and interest in the Scriptures, and are commanded, in the fear of God, to read and search them,[19] therefore they are to be translated into the vulgar language of every nation unto which they come,[2 that, the Word of God dwelling plentifully in all, they may worship him in an acceptable manner;[21] and, through patience and comfort of the Scriptures, may have hope.[22]

17. Matt. 5:18; Psa. 119;89
18. Isa. 8:20; Matt. 15:3, 6; Acts 15:15; Luke 16:31
19. John 5:39; Acts 17:11; Rev. 1:3; II Tim. 3:14,15
20. Matt. 28:19-20; I Cor. 14:6; Mark 15:34
21. Col. 3:16; Exod. 20:4-6; Matt. 15:7-9
22. Rom. 15:4


The Consensus Helvetica even goes so far as to say:

Canon II: But, in particular, The Hebrew original of the OT which we have received and to this day do retain as handed down by the Hebrew Church, "who had been given the oracles of God" (Rom 3:2), is, not only in its consonants, but in its vowels either the vowel points themselves, or at least the power of the points not only in its matter, but in its words, inspired by God. It thus forms, together with the Original of the NT the sole and complete rule of our faith and practice; and to its standard, as to a Lydian stone, all extant versions, eastern or western, ought to be applied, and wherever they differ, be conformed.

Canon III: Therefore, we are not able to approve of the opinion of those who believe that the text which the Hebrew Original exhibits was determined by man's will alone, and do not hesitate at all to remodel a Hebrew reading which they consider unsuitable, and amend it from the versions of the LXX and other Greek versions, the Samaritan Pentateuch, by the Chaldaic Targums, or even from other sources. They go even to the point of following the corrections that their own rational powers dictate from the various readings of the Hebrew Original itself which, they maintain, has been corrupted in various ways; and finally, they affirm that besides the Hebrew edition of the present time, there are in the versions of the ancient interpreters which differ from our Hebrew text, other Hebrew Originals. Since these versions are also indicative of ancient Hebrew Originals differing from each other, they thus bring the foundation of our faith and its sacred authority into perilous danger.


Although I am no supporter of the Dean Burgon society they provide a page with Turretin's section on holy scripture that can be found here: www.deanburgonsociety.org...nett95.htm

The Westminster says that in all controversies the church is to appeal to the Hebrew Old Testament and the Greek New Testament. It then follows that appeal to the Greek Old Testament would be unacceptable. The WCF also says that God kept the Hebrew and Greek pure. It is only the Hebrew and Greek which can be said to be "immediately inspired by God". These people are also working within the tradition of Turretin and you can read his fuller explanation in the link I posted.

The Consenus Helvetica did not receive the same widespread acceptance as the Westminster Confession did. However, it is stating that only the Masoretic text is authentic and that even other Hebrew manuscripts should not be appealed to. The idea that other Hebrew manuscripts could not be appealed to was controversial as was the statement that the Consensus Helvetica makes about the vowel points, but the idea that the LXX is not to be considered authentic was very well accepted within Protestantism.