(Edited to bump post to top of heap)
Visiting Mr. Hudson's KJV Only site a few moments ago led me to discover what appears to be a new review and rebuttal of Gail Riplinger's work:
A REVIEW/REFUTATION OF Gail Riplingers New Age Bible Versions
by James Richard May, M.A., M.B.A
You have to dig these statements from the article:
The journey from page 1 to page 650 of NABV is long and painful. A brother in Christ with considerable knowledge of the KJV only movement confessed to me that he couldnt read it through; its every page is marred by multiple errors of fact, selective presentation (and concealment) of evidence, distortion, misquotation, bad logic and every other possible form of inaccuracy.
.... Considering the absurd errors that fill every page of Gails expos, it is a wonder that any thinking person can endure such rubbish to the end. To be altogether to the point, the book is a filthy rag, a piece of yellow journalism made all the worse by the claim of allegiance to the Word of God.
It takes little research to discover that a large number of the people she libels, while often possessing faults, are not at all guilty of the wicked charges that she brings against them.
She frequently slices up sentences from multiple contexts and reconstructs them so as to make people appear to say things that they never said.
The more time that I have spent investigating the book, especially the hideously flawed endnotes with their hopeless documentation, the more I have realized how pathetic it is. It is so egregious that there can be no excuse whatsoever for its writing and distribution.


