Quote:
White not extolling the supposed virtues of King James Only ideologue Edward F. Hills.
Hills is not KJVO:
Subject: Hills and KJV Onlyism
Posted By: Curtis7777 - Registered User
Posted At: (4/25/03 5:30:03 pm)
Reply | Edit
Hills held to the following concerning the KJV:
1) The Latin Vulgate influenced the KJV.
2) The Rheims version influenced the KJV.
3) The apostles and our Lord used the LXX.
4) The LXX was the Bible (OT) of the Greek speaking church.
5) There are errors in the TR.
6) There are errors in the KJV.
7) The LXX is a model of how we should treat translations. Return to the original language texts.
The Johannine Comma "must be regarded as possibly genuine.
9) He admitted the possibility of a new translation to replace the KJV.
Now name ONE KJV onlyist spokesman who holds these views! I probably can expand it to ANY ONE of these views. You assertion (as usual) is unfounded.
Quote:
he does not answer White..
Dr. Ehrman answered White (not in particular) but this is a move from the dictum of W-H/ Richard Bentley. Perhaps you need to further familiarize yourself with the tenants of textual criticism.
North Carolina

