Interesting debate going on here. As a neutral observer, why do you argue against the KJVO kooks instead of taking on the heavyweights. Lets see some
convincing arguments instead of attacking the integrity of the likes of Gail Riplinger.
I have read through the links here and no one has rebutted with Biblical arguments any of the following writers:
http://kentbrandenburg.blogspot.com/
http://www.febc.edu.sg/as...eBurningBushVol15No2.pdf
I note Mr Brandenburg answers all comers and will debate anyone on the subject of the superiority of the TR. So instead of preaching to the converted here, why do you not take him on?
I have read through the links here and no one has rebutted with Biblical arguments any of the following writers:
http://kentbrandenburg.blogspot.com/
http://www.febc.edu.sg/as...eBurningBushVol15No2.pdf
I note Mr Brandenburg answers all comers and will debate anyone on the subject of the superiority of the TR. So instead of preaching to the converted here, why do you not take him on?
