| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 BrianT |
Help! Online/software with Strongs numbers for apocrypha? |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 1900 (07/01/2009 08:18:03) ezOP |
Hi,
I'm looking for an online or software tool that lets me do searches within the Apocrypha (KJV or other) that also displays Strongs numbers for the text of the Apocrypha. Anyone know of any? I'm all Googled out. Brian
Brian
|
||
|
Euthymius |
|||
|
Posts: 1889 (07/01/2009 09:28:22) |
There wouldn't be such, primarily because the Strong's Greek numbers are keyed only to the NT vocabulary. Those numbers wouldn't even cover the LXX
of the OT, let alone the apocryphal books. The same applies to the Goodrick-Kohlenberger numbers, which again apply only to the NT (though unlike Strong's
are tied to the critical text as opposed to the TR).
|
||
|
BrianT |
|||
|
Posts: 1903 (07/01/2009 10:23:35) ezOP |
Drat. I seem to recall seeing a website that had strong's numbers for the KJV apocrypha, but that was years ago and I'm probably mistaken.
If that's the case, how about any original-language tools for the apocrypha (interlinears, etc.)? I suppose I could leverage off an LXX interlinear, but I was hoping to avoid that extra step as well as the textual variations the LXX.
Brian
|
||
|
amarillo |
|||
|
Posts: 3270 (07/01/2009 10:40:06) Administrator |
just wondering ... wld it work if u cut and pasted a particular word fr the Apocrypha into the search function of, say, e-Sword?
if it's elsewhere, in the NT, u'd probably be able to see it in context and with the Strong's number beside it. easier said; i haven't tried! 
Joseph Ng
"For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven." Ps 119:89 KJB |
||
|
Euthymius |
|||
|
Posts: 1895 (07/01/2009 10:41:16) |
There are at least two older concordances to the LXX, which include the apocryphal books. One was published by Bagster; the other is by Hatch and Redpath.
There also are Septuagint lexicons which also contain the definitions of Greek words appearing in the apocrypha as well as in the rest of the OT. |
||
|
77 |
|||
|
Posts: 688 (07/01/2009 11:12:27) |
Amarillo: "Just wondering ... wld it work if u cut and pasted a particular word fr the Apocrypha into the search function of, say, e-Sword"
77: My pastor says that that approach works great with E-Sword..
"Truly, good Christian reader, we never thought from the beginning, that we should need to make a new Translation, nor yet to make of a bad one of a good
one ... but to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one principle good one, not justly to be expected against; that hath been our endeavor, that
our mark."
|
||
 gconan |
|||
|
Posts: 994 (07/01/2009 15:21:17) Registered User |
BrianT wrote: In book form, long out of print there is the Cambridge LXX. In a 1 or 2 volume's apocrypha (I have a bad memory) Giant book's they had the original, English translation and Textual variants in English. There seemed to be many. Hard to find and probably expensive, but there is one by me at a used bookstore. If you needed any details I could look this weekend. I was once interested in it myself but the price was astronomical. Seemed to me to be the best work of scholarship that I have ever seen. From the late 1800's or early 1900's. |
||
|
Tatermonkey |
|||
|
Posts: 256 (07/02/2009 10:28:52) |
I have an LXX interlinear, but I don't think it has the Apocrypha in it.
He who created us without our help will not save us without our consent. -Saint Augustine |
||
|
mko |
|||
|
Posts: 592 (07/02/2009 11:56:16) |
The one I have is stripped to the Hebrew canon. :/
An interlinear apocrypha, even Latin, would help *my* project :/, since I can't translate Greek at all, and Latin only with difficulty.
"Things don't happen together by coincidence, without the hand of God guiding them. Like, say, your ex-girlfriend hunting you down for a date the
minute you give up on love, with an eye on the altar."
|
||
|
gconan |
|||
|
Posts: 997 (07/02/2009 19:27:47) Registered User |
Euthymius wrote: |
||
|
Euthymius |
|||
|
Posts: 1897 (07/03/2009 17:35:18) |
But did the original Strong's appendix assign "new" numbers beyond 5624 for those words in the ERV or ASV that had an underlying Greek word that
was not in the original Strong's set? I suspect not, but it would be easy enough to check by looking at one or two such variants
(which I don't have a list of at hand, so can't suggest any at the moment).
|
||
|
gconan |
|||
|
Posts: 998 (07/03/2009 19:00:03) Registered User |
Euthymius wrote: You are correct. I was also mistaken on strongs numbers for the varients in the RV/ASV. There English differences are given, not the strong numbers. I had confused Strongs with "The Englishmans Greek Concordance". Later editions by Hendrickson deletes the table. |
||
|
|
