<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Archive 1</title>
        <link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/forums/9</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ <FONT COLOR="#000000"><B>KJV-Only Archive from Jul. 1/1999 to Dec. 31/1999.</FONT COLOR="#000000"></B> ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2000 21:32:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Recognizing the word of God in any language. ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1519/t/Recognizing-the-word-of-God-in-any-language-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <b>RECOGNIZING THE WORD OF GOD IN ANY LANGUAGE</b>  <BR>   <BR> How do we recognize the word of God today?  I am personally convinced that the AV is Gods word (inspired, inerrant, infallible, perfect, etc. as defined by any Bible) in the English language.  How did I come to this conclusion?  There is no verse that says:  The AV is the word of God.  Granted.  Then again there are no verses that say: All Bibles are the word of God.  Yet many on the critical text side of this debate believe that... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Mitex)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1519</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:07:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Subjective ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1523/t/Subjective.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Non-King James Bible Believers want facts.  That is why they ask semi-intelligent questions like: (1) where does it state in the KJB that God said His words were preserved there?  (2) where was the KJB before 1611?  (3) Which revision of the KJB is the real one?   <BR>  <BR> Those questions, and others like them, were hatched in hell and that is were they will be stored for all eternity.   <BR>  <BR> IMHO, those who do not accept the King James Bible as God's words do not want a final... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (dochenley)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1523</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 1999 10:35:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ So hard salvation. ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1521/t/So-hard-salvation-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ No wonder the Ethiopian eunuch didn't get saved in the NIV, salvation is &quot;hard&quot; in the NIV! <BR>  <BR> Matthew 19:23 Then Jesus said to his disciples, &quot;I tell you the truth, it is HARD for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. <BR>  <BR> Mark 10:23 Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, &quot;How HARD it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God!&quot; <BR>  <BR> Luke 18:24 Jesus looked at him and said, &quot;How HARD it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RexText)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1521</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:21:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Overstatements - Sincerity and Truth is the best policy ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1510/t/Overstatements-Sincerity-and-Truth-is-the-best-policy.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ In the fervor of debate sinners will be prone to make overstatements.  When backed into a corner some will makes brazen statements in order to relieve themselves of the heat of battle.  This is sometimes called a smoke bomb by street workers.  The subject has gotten off track or gone down an alley they dont want to traverse so they throw a smoke bomb in order to escape or to confuse the opponent and side track him.  BOTH sides are guilty. <BR>  <BR> Since the critical text side is in the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Mitex)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1510</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:19:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Textual criticism - Something is terribly wrong! ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1511/t/Textual-criticism-Something-is-terribly-wrong-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ We've already seen at least two occasions where the expert textual critics trash the majority reading for supposed internal evidence (but woe if the KJV does that!) and another instance when the Alexandrian reading was dumped in favor of the Antioch reading because it was too ridiculous for even the Cardinal Montini crew. <BR>  <BR> We can discern from that that textual criticism is an arbitrary application of man's faulty wisdom. <BR>  <BR> Let's look at the statements of a couple of highly... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RexText)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1511</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 21:34:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Preservation Vs. Inspiration ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1506/t/Preservation-Vs-Inspiration.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <BR> <b>Yet another problem I've seen so far is that the KJOers seem to be confusing the issues of preservation with inspiration. They seem to assume that for God to have perfectly preserved His Word, that He could have done so (or chose to do so) in only one copy of the Scriptures, the KJV. ---Which is why some KJOers, I suppose, believe in the &quot;re-inspiration&quot; of the KJV.  <BR>  <BR> So I suspect that some KJOers are muddling the topics of preservation and inspiration-- that is,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Gromit12)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1506</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 17:01:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Bible Vs. The Scriptures ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1508/t/The-Bible-Vs-The-Scriptures.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <BR> <b>I think one thing that is bogging down some of the discussions here is the very phrase &quot;The Bible.&quot; There's too much baggage attached to this term, and it is creating a lot of confusion, I think, so we all wind up talking past one another.   <BR>    <BR>  I think a distinction needs to be made between the terms &quot;The Bible&quot; and &quot;The Scriptures.&quot;   <BR> I'm not exactly sure how to go about doing so, however, so maybe William, Archangel, QnA, Scott McClare,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Gromit12)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1508</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 16:51:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Adulterer's Bible, or, &quot;Which KJV is Right?&quot; ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1520/t/The-Adulterer-s-Bible-or-quot-Which-KJV-is-Right-quot-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <BR> <b>In 1631, an edition of the KJV appeared in which Exodus 20:14 read, &quot;Thou SHALT commit adultery.&quot;  If someone got a hold of that Bible today and said, &quot;Well, God said it in my KJB, and that settles it for me!&quot;, how would you persuade them that their KJV was wrong before they went out to <I>*ahem*</i> &quot;obey God's command?&quot;  O:-)</B> <BR> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Archangel)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1520</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 12:48:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Are Pre-Inscripturated Words & Actions Scripture? ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1522/t/Are-Pre-Inscripturated-Words-Actions-Scripture-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ One of the KJVOs on this discussion board has declared that everything that was said (and I must assume everything that was done, as well), prior to being written in the inspired Scriptures, was inspired at the time when it was spoken or done. <BR>  <BR> I find this to be an exceedingly novel idea.  Does anyone besides me find this idea to be anything but absurd? <BR>  <BR> When the serpent said, &quot;Hath God said?&quot;, are we to take that as divinely inspired?  When David took Bathsheba... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (QnA)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1522</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 05:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Are handprinted Bibles the final, perfect Scripture? ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1504/t/Are-handprinted-Bibles-the-final-perfect-Scripture-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ what do our resident KJBOs think? <BR>  <BR> what if there's a typo? are there typos in final, perfect Scripture? <BR>  <BR> === <BR>  <BR> New Bibles Carry Hefty Price <BR>                    Tags <BR>                    Publishers see low-tech, high-art Bibles as <BR>                    publishing landmarks <BR>  <BR>                    | In an age of high-tech publishing, two new <BR>                    low-tech Bibles transform the Word into high <BR>                    artand high cost.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (amarillo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1504</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 04:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ NIV &quot;Anti-Catholic&quot; Bias ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1527/t/NIV-quot-Anti-Catholic-quot-Bias.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ there's never a dull moment where eisegesis n conspiratist speculation abound. <BR>  <BR> while KJBOs attack NIV for a Roman Catholic bias (among other slanders), the RCs see it quite differently! why should we believe either party? <BR>  <BR> this was posted by a &quot;Catholic layman&quot; on a Singapore forum <A HREF=(http://www.antioch.com.sg/cgi-bin/HN_Open/get/messageboard/480/4.html): >(http://www.antioch.com.sg/cgi-bin/HN_Open/get/messageboard/480/4.html): </A><BR>  <BR> === <BR>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (amarillo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1527</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 03:07:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Authority for non-KJBO ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1524/t/Authority-for-non-KJBO.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ There have been several post that have beat around the bush on the subject of authority for those of us that do not hold to a KJBO position. I can't speak for others, but I will lay out my position as clearly as possible. <BR>  <BR> 1) My ultimate authority is the Lord Christ <BR>  <BR> 2) He communicates his authority through his Word, the Bible. <BR>  <BR> 3) The autographs were the pure and perfect version of his Word. <BR>  <BR> 4) God preserved his Word by providing us with numerous... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (WilliamW)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1524</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:50:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Questions for the KJOists ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1512/t/Questions-for-the-KJOists.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <BR> <b>Questions for King James Onlyists:     <BR>      <BR> First, I'd like to know---     <BR> if a person can read and understand both Hebrew and Koine Greek, is it okay, in your view, for that person to read the Scriptures in those languages, or should they read the KJV? Please explain your answer.     <BR>      <BR> I'd like for y'all to read the following and tell me if you agree or not-- (at least let me know the places where you DO agree, if any, since I recognize that most KJOists... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Gromit12)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1512</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 1999 22:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ What is NON-KJVOs criteria? ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1507/t/What-is-NON-KJVOs-criteria-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What is your criteria for determining what is the pure &quot;scripture ... given by inspiration of God (2 Tim 3:16)&quot;? <BR>  <BR> If it is found in *all* the versions, does that include the JWs New World translation? Why or why not? Does it include the Catholic Douay-Rheims, Confraternity, or New American Bible? Why or why not? Does it include the NIV &quot;Inclusive&quot; genderless Bible? Why or why not? Does it include the Black language &quot;Ebonics&quot; version? Why or why not? How... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RexText)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1507</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 1999 17:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Ex. 20:18 in the KJV and NASB: Did the Ancient Israelites &q ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1499/t/Ex-20-18-in-the-KJV-and-NASB-Did-the-Ancient-Israelites-q.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <BR> <B>KJV-Only advocates believe that the KJV alone is God's Word without error or contradiction.  In Ex. 20:18, the NASB describes the Israelites' reaction to the Sinai theophany in these words: &quot;When all the people witnessed the thunder and lightning, the sound of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking, they were afraid and trembled and stood at a distance&quot; (Ex. 20:18, NASB).  The single verb of perception in the Hebrew text is accurately rendered in proper idiomatic English.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Archangel)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1499</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 1999 08:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Ex. 20:13 in the KJV and NIV: &quot;Kill&quot; or &quot;Murd ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1505/t/Ex-20-13-in-the-KJV-and-NIV-quot-Kill-quot-or-quot-Murd.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <BR> <B>KJV-Only advocates believe that the KJV alone is God's Word without error or contradiction.  In Ex. 20:13 we read, &quot;Thou shalt not kill.&quot;  Yet in the very next chapter in Ex. 21:12 we read, &quot;He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall surely be put to death.&quot;  This creates a contradiction -- God prohibits killing in one verse and then commands it in the other.  However, the Hebrew word used in Ex. 20:13 doesn't mean &quot;kill&quot; in general, but a particular... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Archangel)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1505</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 1999 08:45:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ How do KJV-inspireds resolve this contradiction? ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1500/t/How-do-KJV-inspireds-resolve-this-contradiction-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This question/challenge is directed at those who think the KJV is somehow inspired, perfect, infallible, etc. <BR>  <BR> How do you reconcile the two different ages given for Ahaziah, son of Jehoram, King of Judah, in 2Ch 22:2 (42 years old), vs. that in 2Kings 8:26 (22 years old) of the KJV.  Mind you, since 2Ch 21:20 Makes it clear Jehoram was no more that 41 when he died and his youngest son Ahaziah assumed the throne, there is little that 22 is correct.   <BR>  <BR> Those of us who accept... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (One Brow)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1500</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 1999 07:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Discussion Board Status - PLEASE READ (from administrator) ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1502/t/Discussion-Board-Status-PLEASE-READ-from-administrator-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ For those honoring the rules, I apologize for any inconvenience the lockdown has caused. I can't believe that of all times, Christmas is when I have to deal with this.  <BR>   <BR> The purpose of this discussion board has been forgotton and/or ignored. Debate is welcomed, but this is NOT a fighting arena. This discussion board is a place for brothers and sisters in Christ to discuss Bible translation issues in a calm, friendly manner. Disagreement is expected, but <i>issues</i> not... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BrianT)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1502</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 1999 02:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Taking away from the Deity, modern versions ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1503/t/Taking-away-from-the-Deity-modern-versions.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I Timothy 3:16  <BR>  <BR> And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. <BR>  <BR>  <BR> Notice how the King James is very clear in telling us WHO was manifest in the flesh: GOD was manifest in the flesh. Now watch the new perversions throw God clear out of the verse: <BR>  <BR>  <BR> NIV....... He appeared in a body  <BR>  <BR>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1503</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 1999 21:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ My Understanding of the &quot;non-KJV&quot; - and comments ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1592/t/My-Understanding-of-the-quot-non-KJV-quot-and-comments.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <b>My understanding of the other side  and comments.</b>  <BR>   <BR> I hope you will allow me to condense and paraphrase what I understand to be the critical text, non-KJVO or anti-KJVO position.  Im sure that I will somewhat over simplify their position and I will no doubt be accused of using a wide brush.  These things cannot be helped.  I cannot possibly address every issue.  So, please take this post for what it is:  My understanding of your position with my comments interjected.    <BR>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Mitex)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1592</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 1999 14:17:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>