<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>KJV-Only</title>
        <link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/forums/4</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ <FONT COLOR="#000000"><B>Discussion regarding KJV-onlyism. Debate central, but keep it civil. The ONLY forum where KJV-onlyism is allowed to be debated.<BR></b></font> ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:09:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ ad hominem NOTICE: cease or desist ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4163/t/ad-hominem-NOTICE-cease-or-desist.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Rule number one: # No ad hominem: no name calling, insults, personal attacks, etc.
<br>
<br>
<br>
okay, people, i think we&#39;ve let out the leash long enuff.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
so, starting today, this Thanksgiving Day,* let&#39;s all play nice.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
it&#39;s fine to attack the premises n arguments, but let&#39;s leave the persons alone.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
or u&#39;ll be starting ur own ad hominem forum for urselves.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
* to read the origin of Thanksgiving... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (amarillo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4163</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:52:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ is the KJB so outlandish, strange, n hard? ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4160/t/is-the-KJB-so-outlandish-strange-n-hard-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ in a perhaps unguarded moment, a KJBO disagrees with his compatriots&#39; claim that the KJB&#39;s lingo is readable to 5-year-olds, etc., n goes on to talk
about its many &quot;difficulties&quot;: <a target="_blank" href="http://calvarypandan.org/weekly/20080928.htm">http://calvarypandan.org/weekly/20080928.htm</a>

<blockquote>
  My dear readers, 1. Why use the KJV (Authorised Version, 1611)? Good question! Outside of BP circles it is hard to find other Christians and Churches still
  using... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (amarillo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4160</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 06:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ It&#39;s that time of year again, folks ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4159/t/It-39-s-that-time-of-year-again-folks.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">TODAY</span> -- October 10, 2008 -- is Gail Anne (Ludwig/Latessa/Kaleda) <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Riplinger&#39;s</span> 61st birthday!!!
<br>
<br>
Happy birthday, dear Gail, from your friend and neighbor Euthymius! (Remember, when your horse whinnies, it sounds just like my name). <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif" alt="image">
<br>
<br>
It seems to me like <span style="font-weight:... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Euthymius)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4159</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:07:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ I Corinthians 1:18 ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4153/t/I-Corinthians-1-18.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>I just wondered, am I saved or am I being saved? And if I&#39;m being saved, what is it exactly that I&#39;m doing to be saved since salvation is not of
works? If I can&#39;t do anything to earn salvation, how can I do anything to keep it?
<br>
<br>
I was under the impression that I have eternal life (John 5:24) and that I could know that I had eternal life (I John 5:13).
<br>
<br>
Like I said, just wondering if the KJV is the only bible that&#39;s wrong on this verse. If it is I&#39;ll... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (KNO3)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4153</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:12:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Why I Read The KJV ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4152/t/Why-I-Read-The-KJV.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Now, I don&#39;t know if this is just me or not... I used to feel very strongly against other Bible versions, but I&#39;ve since had a change of heart. Some
people won&#39;t read my version, so I guess it&#39;s better that they read some version than no version at all. But here&#39;s why I read the KJV: To me it
seems like it has more power for some reason than most other versions. Also, some other versions seem like they&#39;re saying something totally opposite of
what the KJV says and since... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Edifier)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4152</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:41:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Doctrine Check. ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4150/t/Doctrine-Check-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>It seems a lot of you would agree that the word of God is preserved through many translations.  What I want to know is what do you say when bibles conflict
on doctrine?
<br>
<br>
For context:  &quot;Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: (Philippians 2:5).&quot;
<br>
<br>
&quot;Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped (Philippians 2:6 in the NIV).&quot;
<br>
<br>
&quot;Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (KNO3)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4150</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 00:09:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Is Dr. Waite’s claim that 99% of manuscripts are of the Byzantine text accurate? ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4149/t/-Dr-Waite-s-claim--99--manuscripts----Byzantine-text-accurat.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"></p>I have read a number of books defending the KJV and the manuscript family it belongs to, and most of those
authors place the percentage of manuscripts believed to be of the Byzantine text in the 80-90 percent range. However, in several of his books I have noticed
that Dr. D.A. Waite has been claiming that the actually percentage is 99%. I decided to check on this, to see whether I could authoritatively declare that 99%
of the manuscripts... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (othersideofthestory)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4149</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:08:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ KJV words deny God's practicality ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4148/t/KJV-words-deny-God-s-practicality.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <span class="postbody"><font size="2"><span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline"><a href="http://forum.christiansongwriters.org/viewtopic.php?t=11143">So
practical Today</a></span>
<br>
<br>
Thy word is so practical today  
<br>
Not a thorn unto my tongue.
<br>
Thy word is so practical today
<br>
Not a thorn unto my tongue.
<br>
<br>
When I talk in school
<br>
The kids don&#39;t think I&#39;m cool.
<br>
So, my words deny Thee.
<br>
Oh, I love my cell.
<br>
My party line was hell.
<br>
Please... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (gruvEdude)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4148</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:14:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Cloud Finally Answers Kutilek About Whether the Holy Spirit is an "it" ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4147/t/Cloud-Finally-Answers-Kutilek----Holy-Spirit----.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I just received Doug Kutilek&#39;s email newsletter:
<br>
<br>
<strong>The Holy Spirit an &quot;It&quot;? Unclouding the Issue</strong>
<br>
<br>
Recently, your editor became the focus of an article by David Cloud, editor of O Timothy and rigid KJV-Only advocate. That article, &quot;Is the KJV in Error
in Romans 8:16?&quot; was mailed out electronically on August 20, 2008. In that article, Cloud not only excuses, but actually defends the KJV&#39;s practice of
calling the Holy Spirit... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Armchair Scholar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4147</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:37:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Question for Mitex ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4146/t/Question-for-Mitex.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Hello Brent, I notice that you have several times asked the question, &quot;Which version is inerrant, infallible and inspired?&quot; I would like to ask
you the same question in a second. This is fair. If it isn&#39;t fair, then Jesus is not fair, because he often answered questions with questions.</p>

<p>Here is my question:
<br>
<br>
Which version of the Old Testament is inerrant, infallible and inspired- the Hebrew Masoretic text, or the Septuagint (LXX), or both, or neither of them?... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (HoLogos)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4146</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:05:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Ruckman admits he doesn't know where the word of God was before 1611 ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4143/t/Ruckman-admits--doesn-t-know---word--God---1611.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <h1 class="title"><a target="_blank" href="http://ruckmanism.org/?q=before1611"><font size="3">http://ruckmanism.org/?q=before1611</font></a>
<br></h1>

<h1 class="title">Ruckman admitting he doesn&#39;t know where the Word of God was before 1611</h1>

<p>Ruckmanism falls all apart when an attempt is made to apply it consistently to the area of other languages as well as the era before 1611. The reason for
this is that Ruckman demands a perfect Bible. If Ruckman has a right to demand and have... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Sandra386)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4143</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:07:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Beza, Luke 2:22, and conjectural emendation ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4142/t/Beza-Luke-2-22-and-conjectural-emendation.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>KJV Onlyists (Prax not excepted) make the <strong>false claim</strong> that Luke 2:22 as it stands in the KJV via Beza&#39;s 4th &amp; 5th edition GNT is
<strong>not</strong> a conjectural emendation.</p>

<p>Prax went as far to deny that James White still considers Luke 2:22 to be a conjectural emendation. Yet White, as recently as <u>2005</u> published an
article in Academic Journal contending that Luke 2:22 in Beza&#39;s GNT is a conjectural emendation. (See James White, <strong>The... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (brandpluckt)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4142</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:29:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Did the KJV Translators Follow the LXX in Psalm 91:13? ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4141/t/Did-the-KJV-Translators-Follow-the-LXX-in-Psalm-91-13-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ &quot;Thou shalt tread upon the lion and adder: the young lion and the <strong>dragon</strong> shalt thou trample under feet.&quot;
<br>
<br>
<br>
They translate the Hebrew word <em>tannin</em> which means &quot;serpent, snake, jackal, sea monster&quot; as &quot;dragon.&quot; Most likely <em>tannin</em>
refers to <em>serpent</em> in this verse. However, the word <em>dragon</em> comes from the Greek <em>drakon</em>. Instead of translating <em>tannin</em> into
English as it&#39;s literal... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Armchair Scholar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4141</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:32:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ KJB readable--if some Lib sez it, it must be true ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4140/t/KJB-readable-if-some-Lib-sez-it-it-must-be-true.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ hmm, snooty snooty, eh? <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif">
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080808.w0808fiftybooks-Bible/BNStory/Entertainment/?page=rss&amp;id=RTGAM.20080808.w0808fiftybooks-Bible
The King James Bible A (very) Good Book DONALD HARMAN AKENSON Globe and Mail Update August 8, 2008 at 8:02 PM EDT Like Vladimir Nabokov, the Almighty did his
best writing in English. His Hebrew and German (I mean He, not Nabokov) were also excellent, but... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (amarillo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4140</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:44:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Luke 2:22 and Mythbusting ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4137/t/Luke-2-22-and-Mythbusting.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Another KJVO myth bit the dust when it was discovered that ms. 76 of the 14th/15th century does not read with the KJV. According to Gregory and confirmed by
Hatch the ms. reads AUTWN (the plural possessive &quot;their&quot;).</p>

<p>There is a conference occurring as we speak in Muenster, Germany. A well-known textual scholar happens to be in Germany and has checked the MS in question.
Gregory is correct and Hills, Holland, Moorman, Waite, Ruckman, Cloud, and (lest we forget)... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (brandpluckt)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4137</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:11:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Inerrant translation? ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4136/t/Inerrant-translation-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This is my first post. I have a few questions. First, is any translation inerrant, as in, every word in the translation is without error? Second, when did
Christians begin arguing about the Bible being inerrant? Did they always assume it until modern times, and so not mention it specifically? I know early
Christians seemed to want to harmonize discrepancies between the Gospels to show that they were not in error. So do they ever talk about every word in a
translation like the LXX being... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (teddy)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4136</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:15:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Are accurate Bible versions only ... ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4135/t/Are-accurate-Bible-versions-only-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <span class="postbody"><font size="2"><span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline"><a href="http://forum.christiansongwriters.org/viewtopic.php?t=11143">So
practical Today</a></span>
<br>
<br>
Thy word is so practical today  
<br>
Not a thorn unto my tongue.
<br>
Thy word is so practical today
<br>
Not a thorn unto my tongue.
<br>
<br>
When I talk in school
<br>
The kids don&#39;t think I&#39;m cool.
<br>
So, my words deny Thee.
<br>
Oh, I love my cell.
<br>
My party line was hell.
<br>
Please... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (gruvEdude)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4135</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:28:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Beginnings of the TBS ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4134/t/The-Beginnings-of-the-TBS.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>In 1831, a group formed to promote sound (i.e. without the Apocrypha) copies of the Scriptures. Later this group would promote and defend the TR and the KJV
in English. It did not do so in a manner comparable with today&#39;s KJV Onlyism extremist. Modern KJV Onlyists have hijacked this group. One only needs to
know that E.W. Bullinger was the General Secretary for many years in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. He posited no belief in an inerrant KJV.</p>

<p>I find the history of... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (brandpluckt)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4134</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:37:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Erasmus, John 1.28 and Origen? ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4131/t/Erasmus-John-1-28-and-Origen-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m not going to make any absolute claims on this one, as I myself don&#39;t have the documentation, but I&#39;ve seen claims that the
&quot;Bethabara&quot; reading in Jn 1.28 was manufactured out of whole cloth by Origen, and no one else supported the reading until Erasmus.
<br>
<br>
If it turns out completely unfounded, then it is unfounded.
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-style: italic;">But if it is in fact true, it could prove to be an A-bomb from which the KJV-only crowd would REALLY... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (mko)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4131</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:14:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ no troll zone ]]></title>
			<link>http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4130/t/no-troll-zone.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><font color="#000066">Hi Folks, </font></p>

<p><font color="#000066">  Most of you are familiar with the troll (Robycop - steelmaker) so I will try to keep this short and simple.  I am using
&#39;troll&#39; in the expansive sense of one whose goal is to disrupt threads and forums and who offers virtually nothing of substance and whose words are
untrustworthy.</font></p>

<p><font color="#000066">  I have had a long-standing policy, for integrity and ethical reasons, not to respond to any... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (StevenAvery)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4130</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:44:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>