Archive 2 http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/forums/10 KJV-Only Archive from Jan. 1/2000 to June 30/2000. ]]> en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:17:18 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/forums/10 Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Off topic, name calling and personal attacks ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1714/t/Off-topic-name-calling-and-personal-attacks.html
If they are totally ignored they would have nothing to say. Worth a try?

Randy ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Randy S) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1714 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:33:51 GMT <![CDATA[ Roby & Arc ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1717/t/Roby-amp-Arc.html Paul
madmaksdad@yahoo.com ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ShadowboxFamily) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1717 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 07:09:43 GMT <![CDATA[ KJV vs. Modern Versions ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1716/t/KJV-vs-Modern-Versions.html
I happened upon your "little board" and after reading many of the posts couldn't help but notice your extreme interest in the KJV vs. Modern Versions club. Some of you went to far as to "copy" and "paste" some of the posts onto this board. If you are so interested in that club why not join and post over there instead of posting over here "behind their back" as it were? I am sure you would be welcome or maybe you prefer to stay... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (BoldForGod) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1716 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:40:51 GMT <![CDATA[ Saddened ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1709/t/Saddened.html
I pray God will intervene. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ShadowboxFamily) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1709 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:22:05 GMT <![CDATA[ In the form He wishes us to have ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1715/t/In-the-form-He-wishes-us-to-have.html That means,among other things,that he TRUSTS GOD(as do I) to bring us HIS WORD in the form HE wishes us to have.

Would you please expound on this from Scripture? How does one conclude that "God has brought us His word in the form He wishes us to have?" What criteria do we use? Are their Scriptures to support this criteria?
Who makes the determination?

Is it possible for the word of God to be corrupted? If so how do we know? If not,... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Mitex) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1715 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:15:55 GMT <![CDATA[ Brian's KJV-Only Page on Phil's Bookmarks ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1710/t/Brian-s-KJV-Only-Page-on-Phil-s-Bookmarks.html www.tegart.com/brian/bible/kjvonly/) has been added to Phil Johnson's "Helpful Theology Resources" on his famous bookmark page. (www.gty.org/~phil/helpful.htm).

Phil gave him... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Scott McClare) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1710 Thu, 22 Jun 2000 12:01:36 GMT <![CDATA[ I'm Back ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1713/t/I-m-Back.html
Dios De Bendega! ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ShadowboxFamily) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1713 Wed, 21 Jun 2000 14:42:08 GMT <![CDATA[ What happened to the "edit button"? ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1711/t/What-happened-to-the-quot-edit-button-quot-.html
]]> feeds@yuku.com (Mitex) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1711 Sat, 17 Jun 2000 10:21:31 GMT <![CDATA[ Ruminations on KJV-onlyism and Satan in the Garden ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1712/t/Ruminations-on-KJV-onlyism-and-Satan-in-the-Garden.html
Something occurred to me this morning about Standard KJV-only Tactic #1, the accusation that Bible believers are casting doubt on the Word of God by using or promoting modern Bibles. And so we hear it repeated, over and over again: "Yea, hath God said?" "Yea, hath God said?" as though the mere utterance of Satan's words in the Garden proves we're wrong.

But what... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Scott McClare) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1712 Sat, 17 Jun 2000 03:41:26 GMT <![CDATA[ Whats more important? ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1723/t/Whats-more-important-.html feeds@yuku.com (AMJ) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1723 Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:40:51 GMT <![CDATA[ Testing KJV-only claims concerning the Peshitta ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1708/t/Testing-KJV-only-claims-concerning-the-Peshitta.html

KJV defender D. A. Waite wrote: "The Traditional Text (the Textus Receptus) is like a river; wherever you take a sample, it is virtually the same text" (FUNDAMENTALIST MIS-INFORMATION ON BIBLE VERSIONS, p. 81).

Several KJV-only advocates list the old Peshitta Syriac Bible on the their stream, line, or tree of good Bibles. Thus, KJV-only advocates have identified the Peshitta as being a "good Bible" or the Word of God... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Rick N) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1708 Sat, 10 Jun 2000 13:05:26 GMT <![CDATA[ Read my essay on the King James Only movement ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1718/t/Read-my-essay-on-the-King-James-Only-movement.html www.geocities.com/modern_bibles/

Also, if you want, sign my guestbook. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Missouri Man) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1718 Fri, 09 Jun 2000 22:04:13 GMT <![CDATA[ Regarding Inspiration & Men Who Wrote Bible ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1719/t/Regarding-Inspiration-amp-Men-Who-Wrote-Bible.html As some of you may know, I have a discussion board where I talk with Roman Catholics. So, I've been doing a lot of reading about RCs and what they believe for the past several months.

I have had King James Onlyists insist on THIS forum from time to time that the original writers of the Bible did not know or belive that their writings were divinely inspired.

Well, when I was reading through a book about RCism, the author (Robert M. Zins) stated that this is an argument that... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Kristi) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1719 Thu, 08 Jun 2000 07:21:05 GMT <![CDATA[ KJV vs the modern perversions club on yahoo ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1726/t/KJV-vs-the-modern-perversions-club-on-yahoo.html Unfortunately,it's my experience that someone that young,caught up in false doctrine,is harder to steer to Christ... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Concast Man) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1726 Mon, 05 Jun 2000 07:02:45 GMT <![CDATA[ A question ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1729/t/A-question.html
"For the preaching of the cross is foolishness to those who refuse to believe; but to those who are soon to be saved, and those who are saved it is the power of God."


For those who would accept this passage as valid, what is it in the Greek that would make this verse correct?


Those who not accept this verse, I would also like to see your reasons why. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Jim Ward) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1729 Wed, 31 May 2000 11:26:41 GMT <![CDATA[ Septuigent and preservation ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1732/t/Septuigent-and-preservation.html I think Dr Holland is gone, I really wanted his view here, but any other KJVO'er will do.

If Jesus and the Bible writers used the LXX of their time as some believe, What happens to BP for the Hebrew as the LXX (that we have, which could be what was in use then) is markedly different from the Hebrew text. Would Jesus and the others have used such a "corrupt" Bible?

]]> feeds@yuku.com (HRM2000) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1732 Mon, 29 May 2000 21:08:04 GMT <![CDATA[ A Thought ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1744/t/A-Thought.html
I opened my Bible and read these words tonight: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning.

None of us would argue who the Word is. And none of us would argue about where that Word is. And none of us would argue weather... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ShadowboxFamily) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1744 Mon, 29 May 2000 19:26:40 GMT <![CDATA[ Cloud's forthcoming book on "KJVO Controversy" ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1730/t/Cloud-s-forthcoming-book-on-quot-KJVO-Controversy-quot-.html Just found the following on Amazon:

Examining James White's "The King James Only Controversy" by David W. Cloud

This book has never come up in my Amazon searches before, so it surprised me to find out it's been available from Cloud since August (see Cloud's catalogue).

Anyone read... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Scott McClare) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1730 Fri, 26 May 2000 12:18:00 GMT <![CDATA[ Some thoughts.... ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1722/t/Some-thoughts-.html
I have often found it amazing how often KJV rejectors (those who reject the KJV as being God's
preseved word in English), will use the line "It's the bible the cults use" as one of their reasons. While
this may not apply to all the rejectors, I have heard it more then enough times. usually, the 3 cults
thrown out are the Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons and Christian Science. To this cry, I call FOUL!
Lets examine a few things.

The KJV was basically... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Jim Ward) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1722 Thu, 25 May 2000 10:47:46 GMT <![CDATA[ New Age Bible Versions ]]> http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1728/t/New-Age-Bible-Versions.html feeds@yuku.com (Jim Ward) http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1728 Fri, 19 May 2000 03:49:17 GMT